Semanty

Semanty is a chat app for encoding communication through a change of meaning in the message. It is meant for talking with people close to you. You write one thing, and out on the network sits another fully ordinary and meaningful text. The app already exists, but it is not open to everyone yet.

What happens when the phone is in someone else’s hands: encryption guards the journey, but who guards the screen.

Communication

Today, digital and internet technology gave us the chance to communicate across thousands of kilometres in seconds. About six billion people are already online — nearly three quarters of the world (ITU, 2025). WhatsApp alone carries around a hundred billion messages a day. The whole of modern social and economic life sits on digital communication and information. We can hardly imagine our lives without this part of them anymore.

Starting from runners and mounted couriers in antiquity, through carrier pigeons, and on to modern satellite channels, this transport technology of messages has always been — and always will be — an object of every kind of interest.

Confidentiality

Every transfer of messages and information will always be defined by the level and the need for confidentiality. Who the information is for, what value it has — and for whom. Follow the logic, and the fight to obtain important information will always be serious. The key to every success or failure is who has what information — and when.

Imagine

Imagine you want to chat or speak with someone.

You do not want that conversation — if it ever leaks, is opened, or lands where you never sent it — to become food for profiling or for powerful language models that learn from other people’s words.

You do not want to mention the word boat in a chat or an email… and spend the next days buried in offers for boats you do not actually want to buy.

Would you like to write something important — and have something entirely different sit out on the network? For example: “I want to meet tomorrow at ten and you should bring the papers for the deal.” And whoever looks from the side reads: “How was the weekend? Any fish?”

Would you like to share something with your wife that stays between the two of you — not on the screen children open “just for a second,” after which the awkward questions begin?

We all say we have nothing to hide. But we all want whatever we say or share to stay ours, don’t we?

Would you like that? Does it sound like your wish?

The technology that does this already exists. The application is only the first place where you can touch it with your hands.

What is this, actually?

A technology for encoding through a semantic shift of the real text.

Most people think this way: if it is “encrypted,” I am hidden. And up to a point, that is so.

Encryption protects the path. The letter travels closed. That is the lock that is needed. The world already knows it.

Encryption does not do the other thing: it does not change what the words mean when someone sees them. On an unlocked phone, in a copy, in a model that has received the text — the meaning is the same. Names. Meetings. A boat. A deal.

Here is the other thing.

The technology shifts the meaning at the root. On the path sits another full, meaningful conversation — not a cipher, not “strange signs.” Ordinary human text. And the person the text is addressed to returns it one to one with the original.

For the uninvited observer: the text talks about life. About a weekend or about fishing. For the two who are writing: the meeting and the papers.

For a machine hunting a topic so it can file you into a profile — this looks like a normal task, only the wrong task. It will be noise in the assignment. Future models will be able to dig through many things; if they notice and if they have the tools, they will be ruthless. While the text looks like an ordinary conversation, there is nothing real for them to notice.

You do not need to know how it is made. It is enough to feel what it changes.

The first living place where this is already visible is called Semanty. An application for everyday chat on a phone and a computer. You write. You receive. A group. A notification. On the screen, under a stranger’s eye, the same message can wear another face.

There is also an assistant — we called her DanAIa. That is our AI assistant, who helps the conversation put on the theme you choose. She has no access to your original communication.

The application is not the whole story. It is the shop window. The same layer can live in mail, in a browser, in someone else’s chat application, even almost invisibly — wherever people already write to each other.

Three pictures. You are inside them.

The boat

You talk about a boat. Or a trip. Or health.

In the digital world that word is no longer only yours. It becomes a mark — a keyword. The mark becomes a profile. The profile becomes a week you did not order.

Here, what matters can travel without sitting outside under its real name. From the side it looks like something else. Everyday. Dull. Nobody’s.

The two of you at home

Some things are only for two adults in a family. Money. Fear. A decision. Tenderness that is not for children’s eyes.

Children take the phone more often than we admit. A guest unlocks the screen “to check the time.” The phone stays on the table.

What is only yours does not have to sit written the way you said it.

The person whose work is not said out loud

A journalist at a border. A lawyer in a taxi. A doctor with hard news. A person in a country where some subjects are not written openly.

They unlock your phone. They open your chat or your mailbox.

Instead of names and hours — they see a talk about a recipe. A match. A birthday or fishing.

The curious glance sees a life. It does not see the work. It does not see the real flow of information.

The third picture is not the whole. The first two belong just as much. This is not only for people in danger. It is for anyone who wants their words to stay theirs — at home, on an ordinary day, when one word should not become someone else’s week.

Why what already exists and what you already use still leaves room for this technology

Mail travels locked almost everywhere. The little padlock in the browser too. The cloud says the file is “encrypted at rest.” These are serious locks. They answer the question who reads on the path.

They do not answer the other: what the words mean once they are already in front of eyes — on the screen, in a forwarded letter, in a copy, in a model.

An open box looks like an open box. The subject line is the subject. The attached contract is a contract. The lock on the path has already done its job. The meaning stays the same.

There are products that protect the path very well. There are also those that keep more on the server on purpose. In both cases the job is different: transport, convenience, archive. Not a shift of meaning.

That is the place of the technology. Not instead of the mail, the browser, or the chat you already use. Beside them. Or inside them.

Who needs this — people, not theory

The shared box

One inbox for the whole house. Bills, the doctor, the bank — and a letter that is not for everyone who knows the password. It is not about who holds the phone. It is about who opens the mail.

One search

Once you typed something in the bar that you do not want to become a week: a tooth, a loan, a divorce, a job. Then the whole internet behaves as if that is your life. They do not want a spy film. They want the search to stay a search, not a label.

Other people’s words in your inbox

A notary. Someone in “people.” A volunteer on a hotline. A teacher with a letter from a parent. You keep another person’s secret because that is the work. If the box opens the wrong way, it is not your life that comes out — it is theirs.

The counter

A tablet by the till. A screen at reception. The delivery driver is waiting. Prices sit in an open mail. The guest sees the subject line before they see the coffee. You want the counter to sell, not to narrate what is in the warehouse.

Whoever already owns a product

Mail. A browser. A work tool. A service with people inside. You have the people. You do not have this layer. Nobody here is asking you to change your house. They are asking you to come in — the layer to live with you, under your name, with your people.

You do not have to be all of these things. One is enough — or knowing people who are.

Why exactly now

Not because “security is in fashion.” Because the world has already said it out loud, with facts.

Phones and laptops are opened at borders. Not every day, not for everyone. When it happens, though, the communication is not theory. It is on the table.

There are publicly described cases: a device in other hands, then everything from inside. That the letter travelled closed no longer helps.

In Europe, states are moving their staff onto their own channel, not only onto the family chat. France made it an obligation. Germany already keeps hundreds of thousands of people on a state messenger.

Artificial intelligence learns from what reaches it: uploaded, shared, leaked. A talk about a boat is not a joke to the person who said it. For them it is the week. For anyone building calm products on trust — it is also a question of how their people’s words do not become someone else’s raw material, without being asked.

Algorithms scan the network for keywords without pause, with different aims and methods.

And at the same time there is a paid European niche that funds already buy. So this is not a hobby for three enthusiasts. There are people who pay to have their own calm channel.

The need is real. The moment is not invented.

What is already here, and not as a sketch on a napkin

The technology is not a promise for next year. It already lives in a working application.

You write. You receive. A group. A notification. Phone. Computer. Mail. An ad. A post.

You send a mail about a delivery of oranges and mandarins, and the addressee reads the terms of a multi-million deal.

You post an ad for a kitchen machine; the recipient reads a place and a time to meet.

The layer that changes what is read — works. It is not a mock-up.

DanAIa, who dresses the conversation without seeing the original — works where she is switched on.

It works in English and Bulgarian, and other languages are easy to add. It is not stuck to one joke and one language.

If this reached you

Read it once more from the top. Put yourself in one of the pictures.

If you recognise yourself as a person who simply writes — the door is to have it.

If you recognise yourself as a person who already holds a product or people — the door is to be inside.

If not — there is nothing strange about that. The world is full of technologies. Here there is simply something the others do not do. And a place for whoever wants to hold it for themselves.

A few figures

What the world uses

Chats:

  • WhatsApp — over 3 billion people each month. Convenience for everyone. People stay there for a reason.
  • Telegram — over 1 billion. Huge. Most conversations there are not closed by default.
  • Signal — tens of millions. Serious on the path. On an unlocked phone the screen tells the truth.
  • Threema — over 12 million, a paid European chat. In 2026 a fund bought it again. The price is not public. The lesson is another: the paid niche channel is bought, not only praised.

Mail and work channels (the same niche — a lock on the path, the meaning on the screen stays the same):

  • Gmail — over 1.5 billion inboxes. Convenient. The subject line and the open screen are readable text.
  • Outlook / Microsoft 365 — the office mail of the world. The letter travels locked. The subject is the subject.
  • Proton Mail — paid European mail with a privacy accent. It protects the path. On the screen the words say what they say.
  • Slack and Microsoft Teams — the work conversation on the counter. Convenience for the team. Not a shift of meaning.

Who already wants “their own channel”

  • France obliged state staff onto their own chat, not the family one.
  • Germany keeps hundreds of thousands of people on a state messenger.
  • These are purchases. Not slogans.

Why meaning and the screen, not only the path

  • In one year the American border opened tens of thousands of devices. A small share of travellers. A hard blow if people who should not come out onto the table sit in your phone.
  • There are public investigations: a phone in the hands of the authorities, then everything from inside. The closed path no longer helps.
  • Europe argues over what may be searched in chats. Britain already hit the question of access to the cloud. The direction is one: the device and the copy are becoming more interesting than the wire.